It is very difficult to quantify the market. All we have to
go by is a square metre figure for geotextiles that is quoted without a clearly
identified source. It is not clear what it covers and is not based on primary
research. From this per square metre figure, which I estimate at 2 million sq
m, another set of assumptions have to be made on average weight per square
metre and the weighting of such a figure is not known, but I guess estimate as
being one million tons.

Natural Fibres
Jute geotextiles were initially promoted in Germany and their partners in USA. Again, producers in India and Bangladesh could only look on with
envy. Manufacture could be in India but the profits were in marketing. The
margins were far higher than for traditional jute products.
The geosynthetic industry often agreed to distribute natural
fibres as well to be able to offer a full range of products but their primary
interest was and is overwhelmingly in promoting synthetics. Again, it is
difficult to quantify but assuming a one million ton geotextiles figure, and
similar figures I have estimated in the past, it is possible to try to give
some sort of quantitative guidance.
By 1976 some 5,000 tons of jute were being sold as
geotextile in the USA and assuming 10,000 tons globally, accounted for 2% of
the global market segment. Jute was acting as a trail blazer for natural fibres
in the sector.
Today, some 20,000 tons of jute is being used for
geotextiles and it accounts for just under 2% of the market segment since the
market has doubled since 1980. The growth in use of jute has been significant
and is part of a greater share for natural materials. The main driver has been
the unique natural characteristics of the fibre.
That would be very impressive were it not for the far more
impressive market sales for coir. In contrast to the very limited promotion of
jute for geotextiles, there have been a series of efforts to research the
market and promote use of coir. It started off with looking at geotextiles as
one of the high value export possibilities being looked at for coir. With time
it became apparent that it was the most promising area and has taken coir from virtually
negligible market share (some white coir netting) to around 5.6%, nearly three
times the tonnage of jute being used.
Natural materials have gained a great deal during this
period as geotextiles. From a paltry 3% in 1980, natural materials today
account for 15% of the geotextile market. There is some substitutability
between the natural materials with straw and wood fibres far cheaper than
either coir or jute. But the materials also have unique characteristics and
there is certainly no competition between jute and coir although palm fibre
being developed in Malaysia is able to marginally compete with both, jute and
coir but offers yet another natural material albeit with little known unique
qualities.
Coir promoters have increased the range of product-market
applications. White fibre nets that sought to imitate geo-jute have led to cheaper
brown fibre nets, matting and logs and pillows. A major contribution was made
by the Federal policy in Germany of insulating public buildings that led to
stitched blankets of coir seeded with perennial grass. Stitched blankets have
proven very popular with geotextile buyers and have accounted for a great deal
of the success of coir.