Need for Assessment
We are all engaged in number of activities with an intention
to achieve our objectives and to sustain them. We desire to be successful and
work hard for the same How can we say that we are performing well? We feel what
we did is correct. We decided and designed the system according to our best
knowledge and experience in order to achieve our objectives. However, unless we
verify, we cannot have confidence.
Whatever may be the activity and actions taken, unless it is
assessed, we can not say whether the action was fruitful or not. The assessment
needs to be done against the objectives and to determine the extent to which it
was achieved. There is no second opinion about this and we need assessments. It
is needed to ensure that we are on the correct path. The Quality Management
Systems, therefore, insist on periodic assessment.
Self Assessment and External Assessment
We can get our activities assessed by any one, either by
self, from the people with in our organization or from outsiders. This is known
as "Auditing" in Quality Management Systems. The audits can be internal
or external. The Internal audits are done by the people within the organization,
but from different sections, where as external audits are done by experts from
outside.
No matter who the auditor is, the auditee will have some
anxiety and tension at the time of audit. It is normal that one will try his
level best to avoid non conformities being identified in his work area.
Therefore he might try to hide some files and activities on which he has no
confidence or feels is not correct or incomplete. This happens even in the
internal audits, although the auditors are own people and acquainted, because
they are from different section. No one wants a second person to point his
lapses in systems. Therefore, internal audits cannot be called as self
assessment in true sense. For self assessment, people within the section are
preferred. It is best if the person performing does the assessment of own
activities.
Self assessment is done by people from inside an
organization in order to understand the real gaps in systems or the level of
preparedness for facing an external assessment. This can be done for the
individuals also to assess his/her preparedness for taking up an activity or to
analyse the reasons for success or failure In case of self assessment, there is
no fear of a second or third person raising nonconformity against us, but we
ourselves will be ascertaining our performance There will be no hiding. The
assessment will be impartial when there is an intention of improving self importance
will be given to the values we respect and the goal we would like to achieve.
We need to satisfy ourselves that what we are doing is correct. Self Assessment
is therefore strongly recommended.
Five Golden Questions
To become a winner we should always be competitive and
performing. Whatever may be the activity being managed, we need to understand
the basic purpose for which we are working, how we can achieve, what results
are expected and how likely we are to fare in the competitive environment.
|
People sometimes copy procedures from others
because those were doing well or had some reputation. By this one cannot
guarantee the results as it is not clear whether that procedure is
appropriate for the culture, technology, infrastructure, environment and the
expectations of the customers.
|
A number of Quality Management Systems are developed with an
intention of making the company / person stronger and competitive. Each system
has its own policy and methodology. The promoters of those systems claim their
systems as the best. The implementers, when study different systems are in a
fix, as all seem good, and how to integrate them is not clear. There is a need
for a simple concept, that can help every one. It should help in self
assessment, so that one can understand the reality and work on it. The
following five basic questions named as Golden Questions, if answered promptly,
can help in achieving the targets. These questions are developed considering
the PDCA concepts developed by Dr.Edward Deming, Approach, Deployment and
Result concepts adopted in Malcolm Baldrige Cnteria and the Benchmarking
concepts together.