|
U.S. Garment Imports 2005
|
|
Supplier
|
Value (USDmns)
|
Market Share
|
|
G. China
|
14,213
|
29%
|
|
CAFTA
|
9,104
|
14%
|
|
Mexico
|
6,078
|
9%
|
|
India
|
2,976
|
5%
|
|
Vietnam
|
2,725
|
4%
|
|
Total
|
|
61%
|
This was the beginning of the move away from location
towards supplier as the key factor. This was the era governed by the statement,
"I would rather work with a first-class factory in a second- class
country than with a second-class factory in first-class country."
This was also the era of the emergence of the transnational
supplier with multiple branches located all over the world. Importing customers
wanted to take advantage of countries with duty-free access or proximity to the
United States, such as Central America and Mexico. They just did not want to
work with local factories in those places. Enter the Korean, Taiwanese or Hong Kong factory. You could still work in Asia, receiving Asian reliability, but the
machines would be located in Guatemala or Nicaragua.
This was the period when Li & Fung came to the
forefront. With branches literally everywhere and expertise in literally
everything, Li & Fung could provide whatever the customer needed from
wherever the customer wanted. If what you wanted was a decent product, shipped
on time, at a reasonable price, you could not do better than Li & Fung.
However, the current supplier model is no longer sufficient
to meet the new challenges. And as suppliers move to meet those challenges,
the factory location must shift once again. This time they are moving to a
place called "Nowhere". This is how it works.
Suppliers are now changing their shipping terms from FOB to
DDP, and their payment terms from L/C to open account plus 30 days credit. They
are selling their goods FOB New York (or London or Tokyo). They are opening
design and sales office in every market where they ship. This trend will shift
the entire sourcing process.
Imagine a situation a decade from now, when three customers-one
from the U.K., another from Japan and a third from the U.S.-all working with
the same supplier, meet accidentally at an airport. They start talking about
suppliers. They realize that all three work with the same supplier-Brandix. One
of the customer asks, "Do you know that Brandix is located in Sri Lanka and India?"
The others reply, "No! How would I know that? If I
want to speak to Brandix, I pick up the phone and their merchandiser, or
designer, or technician, takes a taxi to my office. They ship directly to my
warehouse. I have no interest where they have their machines. As far as I am
concerned, they are a local supplier. This is the future where each
customer believes their supplier to be located somewhere else and all are wrong
(or right-depending on how you look at these things).
About the Author:
David Birnbaum is the author of The Birnbaum Report, a monthly
newsletter for garment industry professionals. Each issue analyses in-depth US garment imports of four major products from 21 countries, as well as ancillary data such as
currency fluctuations, China quota premiums and clearance rates.
Click here to read The New Garment Supplier: Where-Who-What: Part II
This article is reprinted with due permission from Fashiondex.com
Refer the newsletter of: The Birnbaum Report/Strategic Sourcing for Garment Importers