The Code is a mechanism within the textile, clothing and footwear industry designed to assist businesses to ensure that they and their supply chains comply with relevant Awards and workplace laws. An objective of the relevant Awards and workplace laws is to protect vulnerable workers. The Code and its accreditation system are overseen by the Homeworker Code Committee.
The ACCC received a number of submissions supporting the Code. For example, Oxfam stated that it promotes the Code internationally as one of the few examples of a code of practice which successfully protects vulnerable workers, in particular, homeworkers.
“The ACCC considers that the Code has a variety of measures which help businesses to ensure that their supply chains comply with existing legal obligations towards workers,” ACCC Chairman Rod Sims said.
“Businesses which are accredited under the Code, are able to use the accompanying certified trademark to demonstrate this to their customers.”
The ACCC considers that the Code is likely to lead to public benefits by providing businesses with a means to efficiently ensure their supply chains are compliant with relevant Awards and workplace laws, and a means to efficiently signal this compliance. The ACCC also considers that public benefits are likely to arise from greater compliance by businesses with their legal obligations towards workers.
The ACCC acknowledges the submissions expressing concern with the Code and accepts that the Code is likely to result in some public detriment including increased businesses costs due to increased auditing and the need for all businesses in an audited supply chain to provide yearly statutory declarations.
However, the ACCC considers that these detriments are limited by the following factors:
On balance, the ACCC considers the Code is likely to result in net public benefits. The benefits of efficiencies in supply chain risk management and of compliance with legal obligations to workers are likely to outweigh the detriments.
Authorisation provides statutory protection from court action for conduct that might otherwise raise concerns under certain competition provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth). Broadly, the ACCC may grant an authorisation when it is satisfied that the public benefit from the conduct outweighs any public detriment.
Textiles | On 28th Apr 2017
Uniform levy of 5 per cent Goods and Services Tax (GST) on all...
Textiles | On 28th Apr 2017
The countervailing duty (CVD) that was imposed on Nepali jute...
Fashion | On 28th Apr 2017
The easiest way to go out of business is to be too big or expand too...
Fashion industry likely to remain labour-intensive in coming years
Giovanni Pizzamiglio, Paolo Crespi & Riccardo Robustelli
Epson, For.Tex & F.lli Robustelli
‘The percentage share of printing in the global textile market is pretty...
Shades of India
Women value something that is unique and has a flavour of India
The Indian market has huge potential in technical textiles, and by far,...
Kevin Nelson, Chief Scientific Officer, TissueGen discusses the growing...
About one in every 20 patients picks up an infection while hospitalised....
<b>Sanjukta Dutta</b> creates unique garments by clubbing prints of...
"You have to truly understand what your client wants, know her needs, what ...
"Now we can see the Russian trend in international fashion. And Russian...