Home / Knowledge / News / Textiles / Board of Appeal upholds ECHA decision
Board of Appeal upholds ECHA decision
17
Oct '13
In its latest decision the Board of Appeal has upheld an ECHA decision requiring information on sub-chronic toxicity, and developmental toxicity in a second species.

In appeal case A-004-2012, the Appellant requested the Board of Appeal to extend the deadline set for it to provide information on sub-chronic toxicity (90-day) in the rat via the oral route. The Appellant requested an extension of this deadline to allow it to take into consideration the results of a 13-week (Dosed-Feed) sub-chronic toxicity study on mice which was planned under the United States National Toxicology Programme (the ‘USNTP').

In its decision, the Board of Appeal considered, however, that the timing of the USNTP study was uncertain and outside the control of the Appellant. The Board of Appeal found therefore that the performance of a study at some unspecified time in the future cannot justify the revision of the Contested Decision with respect to the requested information.

The Appellant also contested ECHA's decision to require information on developmental toxicity in a second species. The Appellant, which had already provided information on a pre-natal developmental toxicity study in one species, claimed that in requiring information on developmental toxicity in a second species as a standard information requirement ECHA had incorrectly interpreted the REACH Regulation.

The Board of Appeal concluded in its decision that the provisions of the REACH Regulation, when read as a whole, mean that registrants manufacturing or importing substances at 1000 or more tonnes per year are required to perform a developmental toxicity study also on a second species, unless, as a result of the adaptations set out in the legislation, such a study is not necessary.

Whilst the Appellant's appeal was rejected in its entirety, the Board of Appeal highlighted that as a result of the principle of the suspensive effect of appeals, the Appellant should be permitted 24 months from the date of its decision to provide the requested information. This time limit is the same as that which had been set in the Contested Decision.

European Chemicals Agency

Must ReadView All

Apparel/Garments | On 6th Dec 2016

Alibaba merges Juhuasuan with Tmall.com

In a business reorganisation, aimed at making it easier for merchants ...

Textiles | On 6th Dec 2016

Indonesian textile sector urges govt to regulate imports

The Indonesian textile industry urged its government to regulate...

Apparel/Garments | On 5th Dec 2016

EC proposes new tax rules to support e-commerce in EU

The European Commission (EC) has unveiled a series of measures to...

Interviews View All

Yashiki Gumber
Sahiba Fabrics

Fabric does not restrict us from fashion trends

Sonia Agarwal
Whitenife

‘The terms eco-friendly and organic are common but everyone perceives them ...

Jurgen Gauger
Spreadshirt

‘Buying crowdsourced or creative designs are much more appealing to the...

Mohammad Hassan
Biax Fiberfilm

About one in every 20 patients picks up an infection while hospitalised....

Mark Paterson
Technical Absorbents Ltd

Mark Paterson, R&D manager of Technical Absorbents Ltd talks about Super...

Larry L Kinn
Suominen Corporation

Larry L Kinn, Senior Vice President - Operations Americas of Suominen...

Robert Brunner
Devereux

Golfwear and menswear brand Devereux is set for greener pastures. Robert...

Bani Batra

Bani Batra’s couture wedding collection is inspired by traditional Indian...

Jay Ramrakhiani
Occasions Elegance Wear

It is believed that by early 19th century, Varanasi weavers had moved away ...

Press Release

Press Release

Letter to Editor

Letter to Editor

RSS Feed

RSS Feed

Submit your press release on


editorial@fibre2fashion.com

Letter To Editor






(Max. 8000 char.)

Search Companies





SEARCH
December 2016

December 2016

Subscribe today and get the latest update on Textiles, Fashion, Apparel and so on.

SUBSCRIBE


Browse Our Archives

GO


Advanced Search