Interview with Gordon Renouf

Gordon Renouf
Gordon Renouf
Founder
Good On You
Good On You

Plan to raise brands rated from 2,000 to 10,000 in 12 months
Australia-based Good On You is an app that provides trusted ethical ratings of over 1,000 footwear, clothing and accessory brands. The app shows how a brand impacts workers, the environment and animal protection to help conscious shoppers make better choices. Founder Gordon Renouf speaks about how they rate brands and ethical consumerism.

How did you come up with the idea for Good on You?

I have been a consumer advocate working on a wide range of consumer issues for more than 30 years. I was also a board member of Consumers International. I learned that most consumers want products that meet their requirements but ideally, they also want products that are made sustainably, without exploiting workers and respecting animal welfare.

The problem is it is too hard to find products that meet your practical and style requirements from brands that do business in a way that aligns with your important values like respect for workers' rights, the environment and animals.

How did you come up with the idea for Good on You?

What was the initial seed capital you began with? Who are the founders and major investors now?

I started Good On You along with social responsibility expert Sandra Capponi. Good On You has benefited from many sources of support, including contributions from the founders, grants and donations, successful crowd-funding campaigns and pro bono input from experts. Last year, a small investment arrived from private investors focussed on creating positive social impact.

How many users do you have? How many downloads per month?

At the moment Good On You is accessed 160,000 times per month, mostly in Australia and the United States.

The app lists more than 2,000 fashion brands. We focus on showing ratings for well-known international brands, the most ethical and sustainable brands we can find, and then the most popular mainstream brands in each country. So far we have focussed on Australia and North America; this year we added 500 brands specific to Europe and the United Kingdom and we will move to other regions and countries soon.

How big is your team?

Right now there are six of us including researchers, writers and software developers.

What are your criteria for rating brands? Do you cross-check all the claims brands and retailers make?

Our vision is that consumers can have access to information about any brand that they want to consider, and so our aim is to list and rate the vast majority of clothing brands that the consumer will come across in any mainstream shopping mall or website, or any ethical or sustainable boutique or e-commerce store.

We make it possible for consumers to make better choices by identifying the key issues that consumers should look at in relation to labour rights, the environment and animals. We then compare the publicly available information for each brand with those criteria. We look at a wide range of sources, including certifications like Fair Trade and the Global Organic Textile Standard, independent sources like the Ethical Fashion Report and concrete specific information published by the brands themselves.
Most experts agree that transparency is one of the first steps that a brand needs to take to move towards sustainability and fair practices. Around 60 per cent of the brands listed on Good On You are rated 'Not Good Enough' or 'We Avoid', our two lowest ratings. These brands have failed consumers as they generally provide no or very little information about how or where their products are made.

We essentially stand in the shoes of the consumer who knows what to look for and has the time required finding the information about each brand.

We publish a detailed description of our rating methodology on our website.

What percent of brands and retailers associated with you are sustainable and use fair practices? Which geographies do they belong to?

Of the 2,000 brands listed on our app, about 450 are rated as good or great overall. A very small number of larger global brands like Patagonia are rated good, the remainder are smaller brands with a strong ethical and sustainability mindset that have demonstrated that they 'walk the talk' on all or most of the sustainability and fair practices.

We do have brands listed that are based in a large number of countries and high rated brands that ship to even more countries. However, as Good On You began in Australia and expanded next to New Zealand, North America and this year to Europe, the highest proportion of ethical brands listed are based in countries in those regions.

What percent of brands and retailers associated with you are sustainable and use fair practices? Which geographies do they belong to?

How conscious are Australian shoppers? What percentage of users of Good on You belong to Australia? Users from which other regions use your application?

Australian research shows that a large majority of shoppers would prefer their products to come from ethical and sustainable sources, and about 50 per cent of shoppers feel conflicted when they cannot find the kind of products they need that are also sustainable and ethical. But shoppers will usually only make sustainable choices if it is really easy to do so with confidence. Other less detailed research suggests that shoppers in other countries have broadly similar concerns; at least once their basic life needs are met.

At the moment our app's user base is roughly a third Australian, a third from North America and a third from the rest of the world.

What are the challenges you faced while putting the app and the brand rating system together?

The biggest challenge is finding a way to create ratings for very large numbers of brands. It is only if shoppers have access to most brands when a comparison tool becomes useful to them. And only then will we start to see real change as consumers find it easy to search out better brands irrespective of their needs. So we needed to develop a methodology that is valid to be used to create ratings for brands of varying sizes, product types and business models. We also have had to develop systems and tools to collect data and keep it updated in an efficient way.

Apart from that, the biggest challenge is finding a way to fund the ongoing development of the Good On You app and brand rating system without creating any conflicts of interest. We do not accept payment from brands to be rated; it is up to us to decide which brands to rate uninfluenced.

Which are the top three most favourite apparel brands on Good On You?

The ethical brands that our users look at the most are People Tree from the United Kingdom and Japan; Know The Origin from Germany and Etiko, a long-standing Australian Fair Trade brand sourced from India.

Do you plan to market and get into markets beyond Australia more aggressively? What's next for Good on You?

We have just added 500 new brand ratings specifically targeted at Europe. The app is available in all countries, the limitation is the number of brand ratings that are relevant to consumers in each country. We plan to increase the number of brands rated from 2,000 to 10,000 over the next 6-12 months and that will include many more brands available in many more countries. (HO)
Published on: 09/08/2018

DISCLAIMER: All views and opinions expressed in this column are solely of the interviewee, and they do not reflect in any way the opinion of Fibre2Fashion.com.