In its meeting from 6 to 8 June 2012, the Member State Committee (MSC) unanimously agreed on the identification of five substaces of very high concern (SVHCs). These will be added to the Candidate List and may subsequently become subject to authorisation. The Committee also finalised 41 draft dossier evaluation decisions.
The MSC identified five new SVHCs: one, diborontrioxide, through written procedure and four dyes at its meeting. As a result of the discussions, it was agreed that the entry for the Candidate List will be made explicit so that it is evident that the dyes C.I. Basic Violet 3, C.I. Basic Blue 26, C.I. Solvent Blue 4 and 4, 4’-bis (dimethylamino) -4''-(methylamino) trityl alcohol are identified as SVHCs only if the concentration of the impurities Michler's ketone or Michler's base is equal to or higher than 0.1%.
These five SVHCs will be included in the Candidate List in its next update together with eight further substances that did not require the MSC's involvement. The updated Candidate List will be published in due course on ECHA's website.
The MSC also unanimously agreed on nine draft dossier evaluation decisions (eight testing proposal draft decisions and one compliance check draft decision).
No unanimous agreement was reached by the MSC in the meeting on one draft decision addressing a testing proposal for meeting the information requirements for a two-generation reproductive toxicity.
In fact, though the majority of MSC members supported a draft decision giving the registrant the choice between a two-generation study (1) and an extended one generation reproductive toxicity study (2) (EOGRTS) with the second generation, a minority of MSC members considered that only an EOGRTS with extra cohorts on immunotoxicity and neurotoxicity and without the second generation should be requested.
In addition to the ten cases of dossier evaluation addressed at the meeting, the MSC agreed in written procedure on 23 draft dossier evaluation decisions.
However, no unanimous agreement was reached in written procedure on eight draft decisions addressing testing proposals for meeting the information requirements for the two-generation reproductive toxicity where the EOGRTS was involved.
The disagreement is mainly due to legal uncertainty regarding the status of the EOGRTS under REACH.
The cases where no unanimous agreement of the MSC was reached willl be referred by ECHA to the Commission for decision making.
(1) EU B.35 - OECD Test Guideline 416: Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Study
(2) OECD Test Guideline 443: Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study.
European Chemicals Agency
| On 28th Jul 2021
The French Parliament recently approved a climate bill that will...
| On 28th Jul 2021
Scientists from the University of Cambridge have produced a...
Buyers in the US, EU and UK are shifting their textile sourcing from...
Multi-functional garments will be next big thing
Water use efficiency remains relatively unexplored
Donating 20,000 N95 masks to hospitals & NGOs
Dhruv Toshniwal & Udit Toshniwal
Launched a year ago, Fashions Pvt Limited conceptualises and sees D2C...
The entertainment/character segment lead as the largest sector for the...
Established in 2015, Once Upon A Trunk is a one-stop-shop with almost...
EDANA has been the leading global association and voice of the nonwovens...
<div>RocketLife, an award-winning developer of breakthrough visual...
Hula Global, a leading isolation gown manufacturer in India, has been...
Sandeep Gonsalves & Sarah Gonsalves
Sarah & Sandeep
Established in 2012, Sarah & Sandeep is a luxury menswear label...
Abhishek Bajaj & Samiksha Bajaj
Samshek is a fashion forward tech brand which combines digital experience...
Gramin Vikas Evam Chetna Sansthan
Ruma Devi is a jet-setting promoter of artisans who has empowered...
Letter to Editor
Subscribe today and get the latest update on Textiles, Fashion, Apparel and so on.
Subscribe today and get the latest information on Textiles, Fashion, Apparel.