“It’s simple: the Berry Amendment requires that our military’s apparel be produced in the United States. The Pentagon needs to comply with the law. I believe that if we’re going to spend taxpayer dollars, we should be doing so in a way that supports American businesses,” Brown said.
“Our servicemembers should not be given equipment manufactured in other countries when domestic options exist. It just makes plain sense to put U.S. tax dollars back into the U.S. economy—and to have our troops wearing the highest-quality boots and uniforms made in America.”
Established more than 60 years ago, the Berry Amendment requires that, when possible, food, clothing, and textiles purchased by the DoD be made in the United States. Following Air Force Times report, an Air Force spokesman stated that the boots did not have to comply with the Berry Amendment because the purchase had been under $150,000 in value.
Brown has launched a multipronged effort to support American manufacturing. He is the author of the Currency Exchange and Oversight Reform Act, legislation that represents the biggest bipartisan jobs bill—at no cost to U.S. taxpayers—passed by the Senate last year. The legislation would allow the U.S. government to stand up for American jobs when China cheats by manipulating its currency to give its exports an unfair advantage.
He is also the author of the Wear American Act of 2012, which would revise an existing law requiring that 51 percent of federal agency purchases of textiles and apparel be made on products made in the United States, and require that textile and apparel articles acquired for use by federal agencies be manufactured from articles, materials, or supplies entirely grown, produced, or manufactured in the United States. It would provide flexibility to federal agencies in the event that such textiles and apparel are either not sufficient or unavailable for production in the United States.
In February 2012, despite more than 35 years of practice requiring that steel armor plate be both melted and finished in the United States, the Defense Department issued guidance in 2009 that allowed armor plate melted in outside countries—including Russia and China—to be imported and subjected to simple finishing processes in the United States, then deemed to have been “produced” domestically.
Brown introduced United States Steel and Security Act, which would require that steel purchased by the U.S. military be 100 percent “made in America”— both melted and finished in the United States.
Textiles | On 20th Feb 2017
The exports of apparel and textiles from the UK have increased by...
Textiles | On 20th Feb 2017
Himatsingka Seide Ltd, one of the largest producers of home textiles...
Apparel/Garments | On 20th Feb 2017
Green Initiatives, a non-government institution, has launched...
Orange O Tec
Contemporary industry is paying more and more attention to the...
‘In future, clothing boundary lines will become increasingly blurred.’
We are ready to adopt or follow every opportunity
Kevin Nelson, Chief Scientific Officer, TissueGen discusses the growing...
Swerea IVF AB
Marten Alkhagen, Senior Scientist - Nonwoven and Technical Textiles of...
Urs Stalder, CEO, Sanitized AG, talks about the increasing use of hygiene...
She grew up in the walled city of Old Delhi, completed her studies, and...
"You have to truly understand what your client wants, know her needs, what ...
Occasions Elegance Wear
It is believed that by early 19th century, Varanasi weavers had moved away ...