“By supplying around 2,500 unsafe children’s nightdresses and pyjamas across Australia, Cotton On Kids Pty Ltd and Cotton On Clothing Pty Ltd breached the Australian mandatory standard for children’s nightwear,” ACCC Deputy Chair Delia Rickard said.
The nightwear was supplied between September and December 2010 and involved the ‘Nicki Short Sleeve White/Petal Spot Nightdress’ and the ‘Girls Short Sleeve Burst Pyjamas Pea Green’.
“The nightwear was so flammable that they should not have been supplied in Australia at all. To compound this, the highly flammable nightwear was misrepresented by being labelled ‘low fire danger’,” Ms Rickard said.
In his judgment Justice Tracey recognised that the potential consequences of the nightwear not complying with the standard were most serious and was a factor which weighed in favour of a significant penalty. His Honour noted that the garments were intended to be used by infants and children who were a significantly vulnerable class of consumers.
“Children can suffer serious burns when the nightwear they’re wearing catches fire, so it’s important that suppliers take the necessary precautions to ensure their products are safe and compliant with Australian laws,” Ms Rickard said.
The Court also made orders by consent against Cotton On Clothing Pty Ltd in relation to its supply of the children’s nightdresses and pyjamas.
The penalties and other orders follow civil proceedings instituted by the ACCC against Cotton On Clothing and Cotton On Kids for contravening the Trade Practices Act 1974 (the TPA now the Competition and Consumer Act 2010).
Justice Tracey imposed a total penalty of $1 million comprised of:
-$400,000 for the contraventions relating to the sale of the nightdresses that did not comply with the standard;
-$400,000 for the contraventions relating to the sale of the pyjamas that did not comply with the standard;
-$100,000 for the contraventions relating to the misrepresentations regarding the nightdresses; and
-$100,000 for the contraventions relating to the misrepresentations regarding the pyjamas.
The penalties imposed are the highest imposed against a company for breaches of a mandatory product safety standard.
“This decision sends a strong message to suppliers of products subject to mandatory product safety standards. These breaches were very serious as they placed the safety of young children at risk. This case demonstrates that failure to comply with mandatory safety requirements can see a supplier end up in court and exposed to substantial penalties,” Ms Rickard said.
Ms Rickard said that the case highlights the need for suppliers to have appropriate procedures in place to ensure that the products they supply comply with the standard.
Apparel/Garments | On 25th Jun 2017
Adobe has released its first Digital Price Index for apparels,...
Textiles | On 25th Jun 2017
First Insight, a technology company transforming how retailers make...
‘One of the recent trends in hand block printing is the indigo process,...
Giovanni Pizzamiglio, Paolo Crespi & Riccardo Robustelli
Epson, For.Tex & F.lli Robustelli
‘The percentage share of printing in the global textile market is pretty...
Moving towards sustainability is also a social change
Iago Castro Asensio
RCfil Distribuciones S.L.
Iago Castro Asensio, International Business Manager of RCfil...
InvestKonsult Sweden AB
Investkonsult Sweden AB has been buying and selling second-hand textile...
Bombay Textile Research Association
Bombay Textile Research Association (BTRA) is a leading name in textile...
Yash P. Kotak
Bombay Hemp Company
One of the directors of Bombay Hemp Company, Yash P. Kotak, speaks to...
Golfwear and menswear brand Devereux is set for greener pastures. Robert...
Occasions Elegance Wear
It is believed that by early 19th century, Varanasi weavers had moved away ...
Apparel/Garments | On 23rd Jun 2017