Market access in the context of FDI policy implies the ability of a foreign investor to enter the investment space in India and the limitations thereon. For example, a foreign multi brand retail investor can invest in India only after the government decision is notified. Thus, access to the Indian market for multi brand retail is blocked for foreign investment till then.
National treatment implies that a domestic and foreign investor are treated equally. The FDI policy itself envisages unequal treatment in a range of sectors which is embodied in the sectoral caps, security restrictions, etc.
This means, for example, that while an Indian investor can invest 100% in multi brand retail trading in India, a foreign investor will still be allowed to invest only 51%. Further, all the attendant conditions of the policy have only to be complied with by the foreign investor and not an Indian investor setting up a multi brand store without foreign investment.
BIPA: The BIPA is a post-establishment investment agreement. This implies that once an investor enters the country, that investor must be treated the same as a domestic investor unless the limitations to national treatment are clearly spelt out at the pre-establishment stage. The FDI policy is a pre-establishment instrument and therefore not covered by BIPA.
CECA/CEPA: In these agreements, India has taken both pre and post establishment commitments. In the pre-establishment commitments, the FDI policy has been bound which means that any rollback would require consultations with the partner country and could entail quid pro quo in terms of concessions in some other area.
Within the FDI policy, commitments may be taken only in some specified sectors (positive listing). Since FDI in multi brand retail trading was not allowed when these agreements were negotiated, none of these agreements is affected by the recently approved policy. Moreover, state and local regulations are not a part of the commitments.
Multilateral/WTO: Multi brand retail trading is classified as a service and therefore covered by the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS).
India has not undertaken any commitments in this area under the GATS. As such, there is no impact of the policy on our commitments under the WTO. Investment is not a part of WTO disciplines except through Mode 3 under GATS.
Textiles | On 28th Mar 2017
The Government of India is likely to impose anti-dumping duty on...
Apparel/Garments | On 28th Mar 2017
The Competition Commission (CCI) of India has approved the proposal...
‘Sustainable fashion is trending upwards, slowly but surely, as people...
'Hugo Boss works with carefully selected sourcing partners'
DLF Emporio and DLF Promenade
‘Each event and promotion is planned out keeping in mind the business of...
Giorgio Mantovani, MD of Corman, with a presence in both Milano and New...
Iago Castro Asensio
RCfil Distribuciones S.L.
Iago Castro Asensio, International Business Manager of RCfil...
Sidwin Fabric is a manufacturer and exporter of polypropylene textiles and ...
Label Ritu Kumar
‘Classics will return’ "There are a lot of people wearing western clothes ...
"You have to truly understand what your client wants, know her needs, what ...
Silvia Venturini Fendi
"Yes, my confidence and positive attitude are my strengths and should be...