To achieve that objective, two years ago, cotton industry leaders proposed a voluntary, shallow loss crop insurance product known as the Stacked Income Protection Plan (STAX).
The product, when considered by the House and Senate agriculture committees during the 2012 debate, was slightly modified.
However, the underlying structure remains: a shallow loss area-wide revenue insurance product that serves as a replacement to upland cotton’s direct and counter-cyclical program (DCP) because the target price provisions of the program were found objectionable by a WTO panel.
The U.S. cotton industry first defended STAX from some U.S. commodity and farm organizations which opposed shallow loss revenue insurance products, in part, arguing that shallow loss plans distorted plantings and encouraged risky behavior. Subsequent analysis has not substantiated either of these concerns.
The National Cotton Council offered STAX as a replacement for current upland cotton policy only. In keeping with longstanding tradition, the Council made no recommendations regarding policies for other crops.
Since 2010, under the provisions of the Framework Agreement, the governments of Brazil and the United States have held consultative meetings on the GSM-102 export credit program and cotton portions of the WTO dispute. These discussions intensified as Congress began to consider multi-year farm legislation.
Brazilian officials have consistently and publicly stated that target price or reference price provisions are the most objectionable of all policy options. In order to provide an equitable option for cotton in the absence of a target price, it is essential that the STAX crop insurance product include an 80 percent premium subsidy, the harvest price option and the protection factor. Each of these options has a successful track record in existing insurance products.
The cotton industry’s proposal was designed to be as consistent as possible with existing products. Further, STAX should be made available to cotton growers independent of any underlying coverage. Given cotton’s unique situation, it should have some policy differentiation if prices were to weaken and other row crops have an option for target price protection.
National Cotton Council
Textiles | On 26th May 2018
The European Union is all set to begin negotiations for free trade...
Textiles | On 26th May 2018
The US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has issued a Withhold...
Sanjay Desai & Ashish Mulani
Digital textile printing will be the technology of the future
'Worsted wool is the ideal fabric for menswear'
Bolger & O'Hearn
‘The Indian market is interesting and rather persistent in seeking new...
Activewear brand Soul Space promotes organic cotton farming and...
Colorjet is among the fastest-growing wide format digital inkjet print...
Established in 1956 with a small beginning, Embee today manufactures a...
Iago Castro Asensio
RCfil Distribuciones S.L.
Iago Castro Asensio, International Business Manager of RCfil...
Voith Paper GmbH & Co. KG
The glass mat industry is growing by five to eight per cent annually. Kai...
Bombay Textile Research Association
Bombay Textile Research Association (BTRA) is a leading name in textile...