Home / Knowledge / News / Textiles / Saxmere appeals against judgement in favour of Wool Board
Saxmere appeals against judgement in favour of Wool Board
25
Jul '09
Saxmere Co Ltd and associated appellants have appealed to the Supreme Court seeking the setting aside of a judgment of the Court of Appeal in favour of the Wool Board Disestablishment Co Ltd, adverse to the appellants, on the ground that the Hon Justice Wilson, a member of the Court of the Appeal Bench in that case, may have been unconsciously biased by reason of friendship and a business connection with one of the Wool Board's counsel in the case, Mr Galbraith QC.

The Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed the appeal holding that, in accordance with the well-established test, a fair-minded lay observer would not reasonably apprehend that the Judge did not bring an impartial mind to the resolution of the question before the Court of Appeal. The appellants have not articulated a logical connection between the Judge's friendship and business association with counsel and the possibility of some deviation by the Judge from the course of deciding the case on its merits.

The case related to funding of Merino wool marketing, whereas the Judge's business interest was in a horse stud. It was accepted for the appellants that there was no connection between the Judge and the subject matter of the litigation. Furthermore, it was not suggested that he was actually motivated by any bias. The question was solely one of appearances. The Judge had no shareholding or directorship in the stud's operating company. His involvement with Mr Galbraith was restricted to a jointly owned landholding company which owned part of the land of the stud and itself bred one or two horses a year.

There were also three small broodmare partnerships. The result of the case in the Court of Appeal could have had no financial impact on Mr Galbraith or on the affairs of the stud. The Court has concluded that an objective lay observer, once acquainted with the facts concerning the business relationship, would not have found any logical reason, particularly in the absence of financial dependency between the Judge and Mr Galbraith, for the Judge to have unconsciously favoured the side represented by Mr Galbraith because of some fear of disadvantage to the Judge if the Wool Board were to be unsuccessful in the case.

Supreme Court

Must ReadView All

Courtesy: Applied DNA Sciences

Apparel/Garments | On 24th Feb 2017

SigNatureT DNA can help prevent apparel counterfeiting

SigNatureT DNA is forensic molecular tag by Applied DNA Sciences...

Textiles | On 24th Feb 2017

Pakistan's textile exports down 1.54% in July-Jan FY17

The value of textile and garment exports made by Pakistan decreased...

Courtesy: The Irish News/Christian Cowan (Google)

Fashion | On 24th Feb 2017

Google & Christian Cowan create 'really blue' jeans

Google has partnered with British fashion designer Christian Cowan to ...

Interviews View All

Pinkesh Jain
Everflow Petrofils Ltd

‘An innovative technology which India needs desperately is the...

Sanjay Desai & Ashish Mulani
True Colors

Digital textile printing will be the technology of the future

Janak Dhamanwala & Sunil Dhamanwala
Jansun

Moving towards sustainability is also a social change

Giorgio Mantovani
Corman S.p.A

Giorgio Mantovani, MD of Corman, with a presence in both Milano and New...

Johan Berlin
InvestKonsult Sweden AB

Investkonsult Sweden AB has been buying and selling second-hand textile...

Kevin Nelson
TissueGen

Kevin Nelson, Chief Scientific Officer, TissueGen discusses the growing...

Judy Frater
Somaiya Kala Vidya

Among the many honours showered on Frater, including Fulbright and Ford...

Wendell Rodricks
Wendell Rodricks

"We should not compare India and the West. There are things we do that...

Mike Hoffman
Gildan Activewear SRL

Gildan Activewear, a manufacturer and marketer of branded clothing and...

Press Release

Press Release

Letter to Editor

Letter to Editor

RSS Feed

RSS Feed

Submit your press release on


editorial@fibre2fashion.com

Letter To Editor






(Max. 8000 char.)

Search Companies





SEARCH
February 2017

February 2017

Subscribe today and get the latest update on Textiles, Fashion, Apparel and so on.

SUBSCRIBE


Browse Our Archives

GO


eNEWS
Insights
Subscribe today and get the latest News update in your mail box.
Advanced Search