Courtesy:NovaComp Inc. 2005


Electrospinning can be described asa process to produce fibers ranging from a few nanometers to severalmicrometers in diameter. This process utilizes the electrostatic attractionbetween a charged polymer and a grounded or oppositely charged collection platewithin an electric field. When the electrostatic attraction overcomes thesurface tension and viscoelastic components of the polymer, the polymer dropletwill extend into a cone as described by Taylor before elongating into a finejet. This jet may possess both stable and unstable regions before hitting thecollection plate and becoming grounded. An example of a typical electrospinningset-up can be seen in Figure 1.



Figure 1: A conventionalelectrospinning set-up Electrospinning is not a novel technique


There is evidence dating back over400 years when Gilbert showed that when a piece of rubbed amber is placed neara water droplet on a smooth surface, a cone can be formed. In 1745, Bose wasthe first to describe the process of electro-hyrdodynamic spraying of fluids and later in 1882, Rayleigh expanded on the field by studying thin liquid jetswhen placed in electric fields and their stability criterion. It was not,however, until 1934 when Formhals was issued the first patent on the formationof artificial threads, that electrospinning as it is known today, was born.Although there were a few papers trying to quantify and experimentally describethe electrospinning process, it was not until the early 1990s that a re-birthwas witnessed. Through the work of Reneker and colleagues, electrospinning wasexperiencing rapid growth and many new scientists were emerging in therelatively unexplored field. During this time, nearly every polymer that wassoluble was a potential candidate for the electrospinning process. Many of the early experiments were focused on materials that were soluble in waterincluding Poly(ethylene oxide) due to their low cost and the overallavailability of water.


Throughout this time, there was verylittle work being presented or being published on the subject ofelectrospinning of polymers from the molten state. The likely reason behindthis is that the research was being driven to produce the smallest fiberdiameter possible. The nanotechnology revolution was being born and the NSFdefined nanomaterials as materials having at least one dimension smaller than100 nanometers. In the case of polymeric fibers, this dimension would be thefiber diameter. Lorrando and Manley experimented with molten polypropylene atsmall distances. The polymers that they worked with possessed melt flow indexesranging from 0.5-2.0. Lorrando and Manley experimented with a collection platedistance up to 3 centimeters and were able to get potentials as high as 7kVbefore discharge into the air began to occur. The fibers that were obtainedfrom this process were in excess of 50 micrometers. This large fiber diameterwas attributed to the viscosities that can be many orders of magnitude largerthan viscosities experienced when electrospinning from solution.


 

It is worthy of note that when producing fibers from solution electrospinning, upwards of 90% of the material being electrospun will evaporate throughout the process. The evaporation of the solvent is a significant factor in the extreme reduction in diameter of electrospun fibers. This is a luxury that molten fibers do not possess. Viscosity has been shown to be one of the most crucial experimental parameters in producing electrospun fibers with smaller diameters. For the most part, polymer melts have a higher viscosity than polymer solutions and as a result, have much larger fiber diameters when electrospun. Deitzel showed that as the concentration is increased in a polymer solution, therefore increasing the viscosity, there comes a point when electrospinning is no longer possible.


However, there are certain steps that can be done to lower the viscosity of a polymer melt. It is possible to electrospin a polymer of lower molecular weight from the melt or to combine the melt with a plasticizer but these will have an adverse effect on the mechanical properties of the produced fiber so an alternative must be sought. It is an absolute necessity to have precise control on the processing temperature when electrospinning from the melt. Some polymers are more difficult to melt electrospin because a sizeable gap between the melt temperature and degradation temperature is desirable to be capable of lowering the viscosity as much as possible without having a major impact on the resultant mechanical properties.


Currently, the focus in electrospinning remains being capable of consistently producing fibers with a diameter smaller than 100 nanometers. Research has shown that at the present time, electrospinning from solution is a more effective way to continually produce nanofibers. However, this technology is not without its downfalls. Perhaps the major downfall of solution electrospinning is the production rate. Due to the evaporation of the solvent, the rate from solution electrospinning is very low. Reports show that by solution electrospinning, approximately 0.01 grams of fiber per hour are produced. Simply by choosing to electrospin from the melt the rate increases by almost an order of magnitude and the yield is increased as well. This rate is still not sufficient to be commercialized but it is a step in the right direction. Another unbecoming feature with solution electrospinning is the cost, not only monetarily but environmentally. The solvents associated with electrospinning are often very costly and in some cases dangerous to your health and the environment. Melt electrospinning eliminates both of these concerns. As more and more industries attempt to use electrospun materials, it is conceivable that the focus will be not only on producing nanoscale fibers, but doing so in the most cost effective and environmentally friendly way. It has been shown that the micrometer barrier could be crossed from melt electrospinning as shown in Figure 2.



Figure 2: Melt electrospun PET fibers

It is only a matter of time until this phenomenon can be consistently reproduced when this happens, solution electrospinning will be a procedure of the past.