Interviews
WTO negotiations could undermine Farm Bill efforts
01 Mar '08
4 min read
However, McClendon warned that World Trade Organization (WTO) negotiations may overshadow the U.S. cotton industry's two-year effort on delivering sound policy in new farm legislation.
He said the U.S. agricultural community has been largely supportive of its trade negotiators' aggressiveness in the WTO Doha Round – even the proposed significant cuts in domestic agricultural support programs.
“But we stated from the very outset that such large cuts in support would only be acceptable if there were real, significant gains in market access,” he said. “We warned our negotiators in 2006 that other countries were pocketing U.S. proposals and demanding more cuts in agricultural support while retreating on market access.”
McClendon, who met last fall with WTO Agricultural Negotiations Chairman Crawford Falconer, said Falconer's two draft negotiating texts – one released just a few weeks ago – include significant specific ranges of cuts for various types of domestic support but “little in the way of specifics on increased market access.”
The texts, he noted, include a section that demands that the United States reduce its cotton program expenditures by more than 90 percent from recent spending levels. The most recent draft, though, contains market access provisions that “are riddled with exceptions that could easily allow a developing country to exempt most of its trade from real increases in market access.”
The NCC chairman called on USDA to provide U.S. agriculture with a clear analysis of exactly what gains U.S. agriculture can expect in market access under these draft negotiating texts.
“It is incumbent on the negotiators to demonstrate that whatever gains that have been won in market access are at least as large as the sacrifices in the safety net for U.S. producers,” McClendon said.
He also reminded attendees of July letters from 41 U.S. agricultural organizations, including the NCC, that were sent to President Bush and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. Those letters stated that an acceptable Doha text “must have equal ambition in domestic disciplines and increased market access.”
McClendon told attendees that the NCC also has been clear in all communications with U.S. negotiators -- that cotton's market access improvement will be measured by changes in China.
“To this point in the negotiations it appears that China will have very little to do in meeting their market access commitments with regard to cotton,” he said.
He said the U.S. agricultural community has been largely supportive of its trade negotiators' aggressiveness in the WTO Doha Round – even the proposed significant cuts in domestic agricultural support programs.
“But we stated from the very outset that such large cuts in support would only be acceptable if there were real, significant gains in market access,” he said. “We warned our negotiators in 2006 that other countries were pocketing U.S. proposals and demanding more cuts in agricultural support while retreating on market access.”
McClendon, who met last fall with WTO Agricultural Negotiations Chairman Crawford Falconer, said Falconer's two draft negotiating texts – one released just a few weeks ago – include significant specific ranges of cuts for various types of domestic support but “little in the way of specifics on increased market access.”
The texts, he noted, include a section that demands that the United States reduce its cotton program expenditures by more than 90 percent from recent spending levels. The most recent draft, though, contains market access provisions that “are riddled with exceptions that could easily allow a developing country to exempt most of its trade from real increases in market access.”
The NCC chairman called on USDA to provide U.S. agriculture with a clear analysis of exactly what gains U.S. agriculture can expect in market access under these draft negotiating texts.
“It is incumbent on the negotiators to demonstrate that whatever gains that have been won in market access are at least as large as the sacrifices in the safety net for U.S. producers,” McClendon said.
He also reminded attendees of July letters from 41 U.S. agricultural organizations, including the NCC, that were sent to President Bush and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. Those letters stated that an acceptable Doha text “must have equal ambition in domestic disciplines and increased market access.”
McClendon told attendees that the NCC also has been clear in all communications with U.S. negotiators -- that cotton's market access improvement will be measured by changes in China.
“To this point in the negotiations it appears that China will have very little to do in meeting their market access commitments with regard to cotton,” he said.
National Cotton Council
Popular News
Leave your Comments
Editor’s Pick
Dr. Michael Duetsch & Man Woo Lee
UPM Biochemicals and Dongsung Chemical
Folker Stachetzki
Brother Internationale Industriemaschinen GmbH
Esteemed Clients
-Ltd..jpg?tr=w-120,h-60,c-at_max,cm-pad_resize,bg-ffffff "Thermore (Far East) Ltd.")
.jpg?tr=w-120,h-60,c-at_max,cm-pad_resize,bg-ffffff "Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited (TSllC Ltd)")
.jpg?tr=w-120,h-60,c-at_max,cm-pad_resize,bg-ffffff "Taiwan Textile Federation (TTF)")
